SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 20417

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Geeta Rawat – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Ashish Datta,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDER S. BHATTI th ON THE 9 OF MAY, 2023 WRIT PETITION No. 10890 of 2022 BETWEEN:-

SMT. GEETA RAWAT W/O SHRI ANAND SINGH RAWAT, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCCUPATION: JOB GOVT. R/O S-812 NEHRU NAGAR, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....PETITIONER (BY MS. ANJALI SHRIVASTAVA - ADVOCATE)

AND

1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. COMMISSIONER BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

3. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER TAHSIL HUZUR BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

4. TEHSILDAR TAHSIL HUZUR DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

5. NEERAJ PATIDAR S/O MOHANLAL PATIDAR R/O BARKHEDA NATHU TAHSIL HUZUR BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI ARNAV TIWARI - PANEL LAWYER)

This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

This petition has been filed assailing the order dated 18.02.2020 (Annesure-P/8) passed by respondent No.4/Tahsildar Tahesil Huzur District Signature Not Verified Signed by: PRARTHANA Bhopal.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner contends that the petitioner purchased the land situated Khasra No.4461/1 vide sale-deed dated 19.03.2013 from private respond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top