2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 20979
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sumitra Devi – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Prasad Pathak – Respondent
SA 1118/2021
Balmik Prasad Tiwari,Advocate General
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA ON THE 10th OF MAY, 2023 SECOND APPEAL No. 1118 of 2021 BETWEEN:-
1. SUMITRA DEVI W/O LATE SHRI RAMMAN BYAS, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL R/O DEVRI, POST AMMA, TAHSIL NAGUD, DISTRICT SATNA (M.P.) PRESENTLY R/O RANIPURA, DISTRICT PANNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. SMT. KAMLA PATHAK D/O LATE SHRI RAMMAN VYAS W/O RAMESH PRASAD PATHAK, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSE WIFE R/O VILLAGE BADOHRA TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPELLANTS (BY MS. PRIYA TIWARI - ADVOCATE )
AND
1. RAMESH PRASAD PATHAK S/O LATE SHRI LAXMAN PRASAD PATHAK R/O VILLAGE BADOHARA TAHSIL NAGUD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. MADAN MOHAN VYAS S/O SHRI BHAGWANDEEN VYAS, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O DEVRI TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. DADDU LAL KUSHWAHA S/O SHRI JUGRAJ KUSHWAHA R/O VILLAGE AMMA, TAHSIL NAGOD DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
4. VATSRAM (DEAD) THR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
4.1 SMT. NANDU W/O VATSRAM GARG, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE DEVRI POST AMMA TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRCT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.2. SMT. SHANTI D/O LATE SHRI VASTRAM GARG, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE DEVRI POST AMMA, TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.3. RAMJI S/O LATE SHRI VASTRAM, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE DEVRI POST AMMA, TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.4. RAMNARESH S/O LATE SHRI VASTRAM, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O VILL. DEVRI POST AMMA TAH. NAGOD SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.5 RAMAKANT S/O VATSRAM, AGED ABOUT
36 YEARS R/O VILLAGE DEVRI POST AMMA, TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.6. SMT. KANTI D/O LATE SHRI VASTRAM GARG, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE DEVRI POST AMMA, TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.7. SMT. GANGA D/O LATE SHRI VASTRAM GARG, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE DEVRI POST AMMA, TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.7. SMT. URMILA D/O LATE SHRI VASTRAM GARG, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE DEVRI POST AMMA, TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
5. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH COLLECTOR DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
6. HIRAMAN VYAS S/O MADAN MOHAN [DEAD] THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
6.1 SATYAWATI VYAS W/O HIRAMAN VYAS R/O VILLAGE DEVRI, TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
6.2. RAMBHAIYA S/O HIRAMAN VYAS R/O VILLAGE DEVRI, TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
6.3. PUSHPENDRA VYAS S/O LATE SHRI HIRAMAN VYAS R/O VILLAGE DEVRI, TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
6.4. DEVENDRA KUMAR VYAS S/O LATE SHRI HIRAMAN VYAS R/O VILLAGE DEVRI, TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
6.5. POOJA W/O NITIN MISHRA D/O LATE SHRI HIRAMAN VYAS R/O NEW BUS STAND ALLAHABAD ROAD REWA, DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
7. RAM BHAIYA BRAMHAN S/O LATE SHRI HIRAMAN VYAS R/O R/O VILLAGE DEVRI, TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
8. PRAM SHANKAR BRAMHAN S/O DADDU LAL BRAMHAN R/O VILLAGE DEVRI, TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
9. RAJ BAHADUR KUSHWAHA S/O DADDU LAL KUSHWAHA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE AMMA, TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
10. RAM PRAKASH S/O DADDU LAL KUSHWA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/O VILLAGE AMMA, TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
11. SURYA PRAKASH S/O DADDU LAL KUSHWAHA [DEAD] THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
11.1. SHEELA W/O LATE SHRI SURYA PRAKASH KUSHWAHA R/O VILLAGE AMMA, TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
11.2. RAJNI D/O SURYA PRAKASH KUSHWAHA, AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS, MINOR THR SMT. SHEELA W/O LATE SHRI SURYA PRAKASH KUSHWAHA R/O VILLAGE AMMA, TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
11.3. PANKAJ S/O SURYA PRAKASH KUSHWAHA, AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS MINOR THR. SMT. SHEELA W/O LATE SHRI SURYA PRAKASH KUSHWAHA R/O VILLAGE AMMA, TAHSIL NAGOD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS (MS. SHANTI TIWARI – PANEL LAWYER FOR RESPONDENT NO.5/STATE )
……………………………………………………………………………………………
This appeal coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal under Sectio