SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 21435

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sajjansingh – Appellant
Versus
Jujarsingh – Respondent


Advocates:
Manoj Saxena Dad R.N.21-7-98,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA st ON THE 1 OF JULY, 2023 MISC. PETITION No. 841 of 2021 BETWEEN:-

SAJJANSINGH S/O PARVATSINGH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST, VILLAGE - DUNGER KHEDI, TEHSIL MAHIDPUR, DISTRICT UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....PETITIONER (BY SHRI ANIRUDH SAXENA - ADVOCATE)

AND

1. JUJARSINGH S/O PARVATSINGH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST, VILLAGE - DUNGER KHEDI, TEHSIL MAHIDPUR, DISTRICT UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, UJJAIN, DISTRICT UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)

3. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MAHIDAPUR, DISTRICT UJJAIN. (MADHYA PRADESH)

4. TEHSILDAR, MAHIDPUR, DISTRICT UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS ( RESPONDENT NO.1 BY SHRI BRIJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA - ADVOCATE AND RESPONDENT NO.4/STATE BY MS. GEETANJALI CHAURASIA -

GOVT. ADVOCATE)

This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is finally heard.

Signature Not Verified Signed by: NEERAJ

2. This petition has been preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved by the order dated 29.01.2021 (Annexure P/1) passed by the Additional C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top