SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 22146

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Chandra Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Arvind Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Mohammad Aadil Usmani,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA th ON THE 5 OF JULY, 2023 MISC. PETITION No. 1116 of 2022 BETWEEN:-

CHANDRA KUMAR JAIN S/O KANCHEDILAL JAIN PANAR BHATTA WALI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS SHOPKEEPER NEAR MARDHANPUR LALBAHADUR SHASTRI WARD SAGAR TEHSIL AND DISTRICT SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....PETITIONER (BY SHRI MOHAMMAD AADIL USMANI - ADVOCATE)

AND

1. ARVIND KUMAR S/O LATE BAULAL JAIN, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCCUPATION: SHOPKEEPER SURKHI TEHSIL AND DISTRICT SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. MAHESH KUMAR S/O LATE BABULAL JAIN, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCCUPATION: SHOPKEEPER R/O SURKHI, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT- SAGAR, (MADHYA PRADESH)

3. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH COLLECCTOR DISTRICT- SAGAR, (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI RAJENDRA KUMAR RAGHUWANSHI - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1)

This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has been filed against the order dated 14.02.2022 (Annexure-P/9) passed by Sixth Civil Judge, Senior Signature Not Verified Signed by: PRARTHANA Division Sagar in RCSA No. A/280/2017 by which the appl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top