SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 22937

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Phulle @ Phool Chand – Appellant
Versus
Narayan – Respondent


Advocates:
R.K.Pandey,Ajay Kumar Jain,Rajeev Barkur,Amit Jain,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL th ON THE 10 OF JULY, 2023 WRIT PETITION No. 11995 of 2007 BETWEEN:-

PHULLE ALIAS PHOOL CHAND S/O POORAN NAI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION: MAZDOOR AND BARBOUR, R/O VILL.KIRROD TAH. BINA DISTT. SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....PETITIONER (SHRI ABHISHEK TIWARI - ADVOCATE)

AND

1. NARAYAN S/O LATE RAM PRASAD SARAF R/O VILL.ACHAWAL WARD BINA TAH. BINA DISTT.

SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. PHUJJA S/O LATE RAM PRASAD SARAF R/O VILL.ACHAWAL WARD BINA TAH. BINA DISTT.

SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

3. GANESH RAM, S/O NATHURAM R/O VILL.ACHAWAL WARD BINA TAH. BINA DISTT.

SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

4. SANTOSH SINGH, S/O GANESH RAM R/O VILL.KORROD TAH.BINA DISTT.SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

5. THE COLLECTOR DISTT. SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

6. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER BINA DISTT. SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI RAJEEV BARKUR - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.4)

This petition coming on for hearing this day, the court passed the Signature Not Verified following:

ORDER

In first round learned counsel for the petitioner had sought time to point out that provisions of M.P. Samaj Ke Kamjor Vargon Ke liye Krishi Bhumi- Dharakon Ka Udhar Dene Walon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top