HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Phulle @ Phool Chand – Appellant
Versus
Narayan – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL th ON THE 10 OF JULY, 2023 WRIT PETITION No. 11995 of 2007 BETWEEN:-
PHULLE ALIAS PHOOL CHAND S/O POORAN NAI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION: MAZDOOR AND BARBOUR, R/O VILL.KIRROD TAH. BINA DISTT. SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER (SHRI ABHISHEK TIWARI - ADVOCATE)
AND
1. NARAYAN S/O LATE RAM PRASAD SARAF R/O VILL.ACHAWAL WARD BINA TAH. BINA DISTT.
SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. PHUJJA S/O LATE RAM PRASAD SARAF R/O VILL.ACHAWAL WARD BINA TAH. BINA DISTT.
SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. GANESH RAM, S/O NATHURAM R/O VILL.ACHAWAL WARD BINA TAH. BINA DISTT.
SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
4. SANTOSH SINGH, S/O GANESH RAM R/O VILL.KORROD TAH.BINA DISTT.SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
5. THE COLLECTOR DISTT. SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
6. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER BINA DISTT. SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI RAJEEV BARKUR - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.4)
This petition coming on for hearing this day, the court passed the Signature Not Verified following:
ORDER
In first round learned counsel for the petitioner had sought time to point out that provisions of M.P. Samaj Ke Kamjor Vargon Ke liye Krishi Bhumi- Dharakon Ka Udhar Dene Walon
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.