SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 23922

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Balram – Appellant
Versus
Atmaram – Respondent


Advocates:
Karpe Prakhar Mohan,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBODH ABHYANKAR th ON THE 14 OF JULY, 2023 MISC. PETITION No. 1632 of 2022 BETWEEN:-

BALRAM S/O KALU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE R/O VILLAGE PIPALJHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....PETITIONER (BY MS. PRANJALI YAJURVEDI, ADVOCATE)

AND

1. ATMARAM S/O DEVRAM, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE R/O BARWAH (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. SHANTILAL S/O DEVRAM, AGED ABOUT

46 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE BARWAH, (MADHYA PRADESH)

3. CHINTARAM S/O DEVRAM, AGED ABOUT

43 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE BARWAH, (MADHYA PRADESH)

4. JAMNABAI W/O DEVRAM, AGED ABOUT

68 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE BARWAH, (MADHYA PRADESH)

5. STATE OF M.P. THR. COLLECTOR, KHARGONE (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS (BY MS. BHAGYSHREE GUPTA, GOVT. ADVOCATE)

………………………………………………………………………………. This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

1] The petitioner/plaintiff has been filed the present petition under Signature Not Verified Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 08.03.2022 (Annexure P/6), passed in Misc. Civil Appeal No.07/2019, by the Second Additional District Judge, Barwaha, Mand

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top