IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA th ON THE 4 OF SEPTEMBER, 2023 REVIEW PETITION No. 839 of 2023 BETWEEN:-

RAHUL NAMDEO DHOTE S/O SHRI NAMDEO DHOTE, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCCUPATION: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILA PANCHAYAT SIDHI, DISTRICT SIDHI (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....PETITIONER (BY SHRI PRAKASH UPADHYAY - ADVOCATE)

AND

1. VIKAS KUMAR SHUKLA S/O SHRI BHAGWAT PRASAD SHUKLA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, VILLAGE, DURAOWN, POST KAROULIKALA, TEHSIL SIHAWAL, DISTRICT SIDHI (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MANTRALAYA, VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

3. THE MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARNATEE SCHEME REGISTERED UNDER THE PANCHAYAT RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MANTRALAYA, THROUGH ITS JOINT COMMISSIONER ADMINISTRATION, NARMADA BHAWAN, SECOND FLOOR C WING, 59, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

4. THE COMMISSIONER, REWA DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)

5. THE COLLECTOR CUM DISTRICT PROGRAMME COORDINATOR UNDER THE M.P. STATE EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE COUNCIL, SIDHI, DISTRICT SIDHI (MADHYA PRADESH)

Signature Not Verified Signed by: PRIYANKA

6. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILA PANCHAYAT, SIDHI (MADHYA PRADESH)

7. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, JANAPAD PANCHAYAT, SIHAWAL, DISTRICT SIDHI (MADHYA PRADESH)

8. THE GRAM PANCHAYAT, KAROULIKALA THROUGH ITS SARPANCH, BLOCK SIHAWAL, DISTRICT SIDHI (MADHYA PRADESH)

9. MR. SUDAMA PRASAD VERMA S/O SHRI RAJMANI VERMA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCCUPATION: SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT KAROULIKALA, BLOCK 1 SHIHAWAL, R/O VILLAGE PARSOUNIKALA, TEHSIL SIHAWAL, DISTRICT SIDHI (MADHYA PRADESH)

10. MR RAMJAS PRAJAPATI S/O SHRI RAJVALI PRAJAPATI, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE JOKAHA, TEHSIL SIHAWAL, DISTRICT SIDHI (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI ATAURREHMAN ANSARI- ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1)

This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

This review application under Section 47 read with Section 1 of CPC has been filed for review of order dated 27.06.2023 passed by this Court in W.P. No.6136/2014 on the ground that applicant had appeared for the first time before the High Court therefore, he could not understand the proceedings of the Court and some incorrect statements were made.

Considered the submissions made by counsel for applicant.

On 27.06.2023, applicant had made a specific statement that the record was misplaced in the Office of Commissioner, Rewa and therefore, it could not be produced. When this Court called an explanation from Commissioner, Rewa Signature Not Verified Signed by: PRIYANKA in the form of an affidavit by pointing out the issues, then applicant immediately took a summer salt and started claiming that he had made a false statement thereby putting blame on the Court of Commissioner. Thus, it was clear that although applicant was afraid of Commissioner, but he was not afraid of the Court proceedings.

Be that whatever it may be. Making a false statement before the Court amounts to contempt of Court and this Court by not drawing the contempt proceedings has already shown mercy towards applicant.

As no error apparent on face of record could be pointed out by counsel for applicant, accordingly no case is made out warranting interference.

Review petition fails and is hereby dismissed (G.S. AHLUWALIA)

JUDGE Priya.P Signature Not Verified Signed by: PRIYANKA