IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH ON THE 05 ^th OF SEPTEMBER, 2023 FIRST APPEAL No. 810 of 2006 BETWEEN:-

1. SMT.GEETABAI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS 1(A) KHUMAN SINGH RAJPUT S/O HAJARI LAL RAJPUT, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/O DUNGARIYA, LALARIYA, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. SORAM BAI W/O BADAM SINGH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, NOT MENTION (MADHYA PRADESH)

3. MAMTA W/O LAXMAN SINGH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O 135 VILLAGE AMJHARA, TEHSIL HUZUR, JAMONIYA, KALAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

4. VIKRAM SINGH S/O KHUMAN SINGH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O DUNGARIYA, LALARIYA, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....APPELLANT (BY Ms. MUSKAN MAKHAN – PROXY COUNSEL ON BEHALF OF SHRI ANURAG GOHIL - ADVOCATE )

AND

1. VISHAL SINGH S/O LATE SHRI GORELAL, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE PALASI, TAHSIL - HUZUR DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. SMT.(DR.) HUMERA MATEEN W/O SHRI DR. MOHAMMAD MATEEN, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O 46,SAIDIYA SCHOOL ROAD, ITWARA, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

3. SMT. MUSMAT RAJIYA BEGUM W/O SHRI AZEEZ MOHAMMAD SAHEB R/O 172-B-SECTOR, NIZAMAUDDIN COLONY,BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

4. AZEEZ MOHAMMAD S/O SHRI SAIED AHMAD SAHEB R/O 172-B-

SECTOR, NIZAMAUDDIN COLONY,BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

5. DR. ANEESURRAHMAN S/O ABDUL RAHEEM SIDDIQUI R/O HOUSE NO.3/15,M.A.N.I.T., CAMPUS, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

6. KU. SANIYA ANEES D/O DR. ANEESURRAHMAN R/O HOUSE NO.3/15, M.A.N.I.T., CAMPUS, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

7. PRATEEK GRAH NIRMAN SAHKARI SANSTHA, THROUGH PRESIDENT SMT. SAMEENA R/O HOUSE NO. 15-16, NISHAT COLONY, 74 BUNGLOW, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

8. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH COLLECTOR COLLECTOR OFFICE, BERAGARH, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI A.K. SINGH – ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENTS NO. 3 & 4, SHRI AMITABH GUPTA – ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENTS NO. 5 & 6 AND SHRI ASHOK SINHA – PANEL LAWYER FOR RESPONDENT NO. 8/

STATE , NONE FOR RESPONDENTS NO. 1 AND 2)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reserved on : 10.08.2023 Pronounced on : 05.09.2023 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This appeal having been heard and reserved for orders, coming on for pronouncement this day, the Court passed the following:

ORDER

1) This appeal has been filed by the appellant/ plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2006 passed by the learned Sixth Additional District Judge, Bhopal in Civil Suit No. 148-A/2006. By the impugned order, learned Court has allowed the application filed on behalf of the respondent/ defendant No.7 under Order 7, Rule 11 of C.P.C. in the suit filed by the plaintiff for partition, possession, permanent injunction and declaration.

2) Learned trial Court has allowed the application on the following ground :-

“oknh }kjk ;g Hkh vuqrks’k pkgk x;k gS fd izfroknh x.k 2 ls 7 fookfnr Hkwfr dks vU; fdlh dks glrkukarfjr u djs vkSj {kfriwfrZ jkf”k 25]000@& :i;s dh ekax Hkh dh xbZ gSA ftl jkf”k ij oknh ,Moksysje dksVZfQl vnk djus dk mRrjnk;h gS pwafd dCts dk vuqrks’k ikfj.kkfed lgk;rk ds :i esa pkgk x;k gS blfy;s ml ij Hkh ,Moksysje dksVZ fQl vnk dh tkuh pkfg,A izfroknh Ø0&7 ,d x`gfuekZ.k lfefr gS /kkjk 94 e0iz0 lgkdkjh lfefr vf/kfu;e ds vra xZr jftLVªkj vkQ lkslkbZVh dks nkok izLrqr djus dh lwpuk nsuk vfuok;Z gSA oknh }kjk O;Dr fd;k x;k gS fd pwafd og mDr lgdkjh laLFkk dk lnL; ugha gS blfy;s mls uksfVl nsuk vko”;d ugha gSA esjs fopkj esa oknh dh ;g vkifRr ekuus ;ksX; ugha gS pwafd nkok izfroknh Øekad 7 tks dh ,d lgdkjh lfefr gS ds O;olk; ls lacaf/kr gS] mlds fo:) nkok nk;j djus ds iwoZ /kkjk 94 dh uksfVl ugha fn;s tkus ls ,d vkKkid izko/kku dk mYya?ku gkrs k gS oknh }kjk mDr vkKkid izko/kku dk ikyu ugha fd;k x;k gS ftlls oknh dk ;g nkok vkns”k 7 fu;e 11 ds vra xZr izpyu ;ksX; ugha ik;k tkrk vr% nkok fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA”

3) Against the impugned order of the learned trial Court, the appellant is before this Court on the ground that the trial Court misconstituted the scope of the Order 7, Rule 11 of C.P.C. Finding of