SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2934

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA, J
The State Of Mp. – Appellant
Versus
Maya Bai (Name Deleted) – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate General,I.Ahmed,Nishar Ahmed, Shakil Ahmad,Sl Agrawal

ORDER

1. Since these appeals have been preferred against a common judgment passed by the trial Court they have been heard together and are being decided by a common judgment.

2. F.A. No.524/1998 has been preferred by the plaintiffs Shri Kalbhairav Murti and its pujaris whereas F.A. No.246/2000 has been preferred by defendant No.6 State of Madhya Pradesh.

3. The facts of the case in brief are that plaintiffs instituted an action on 11.06.1984 before the trial Court for declaration of title to the suit land bearing survey No.244 area 3.743 hectare, for declaration that the order dated 21.02.1984 passed by the Board of Revenue is illegal, for possession of the suit land and mesne profits.

4. As per the plaintiffs, in District Dhar, near Ratnagara tank is an old and ancient temple by the name of Kalbhairav temple. Plaintiffs 1 to 3 and their ancestors have been the Pujaris of the temple and have been receiving emoluments also from the State Government. For the management of the temple the suit land had been given about 200 years ago by the ruler of Dhar to the pujaris of which they have been taking care ever since then. Since a few years the suit land has been given by Pujari plaintiff No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top