SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3271

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
JUSTICE ASHISH SHROTI, J
Ghasiram – Appellant
Versus
Mulabai @ Bhagwati Bai – Respondent


Advocates:
Arman Ali Khan,Advocate General

ORDER

The appellant has filed this petition challenging the judgment, dated 05.09.2023, passed by District Judge Chanderi, District Ashoknagar (M.P.) in Regular Civil Appeal No.23-A of 2022 whereby learned Appellate Court has set aside the order passed by the learned Trial Court and has remanded the matter for adjudication of suit on merits. Prior thereto, the Trial Court vide judgment dated 20.09.2022 had allowed the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC filed by appellant and rejected the plaint filed by the respondent no.1 being barred by Order 23 Rule 1 CPC.

[2]. Since, the status of parties to this appeal is different in two suits being discussed in this order, in order to avoid confusion, they are referred with their names in this order as Ghasiram (defendant of this suit and plaintiff in earlier suit) and Smt. Mula Bai (plaintiff of this suit and plaintiff in earlier suit).

[3]. The facts which are not in dispute between the parties is that the land bearing Survey No.145 ad-measuring 1.986 hectare situated at Kasba Chanderi, District Ashoknagar (M.P.) was owned by one Amra Sahu. Ghasiram has filed a separate suit (C.S. No.4-A/2016) claiming declaration of his title over the sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top