Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR, J
DEVKARAN SISODIYA – Appellant
Versus
RAVI VERMA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial procedural aspects of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of the complaint and loan agreement. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments presented by the accused regarding conviction. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's jurisdiction and review standards. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. presumptions regarding negotiable instruments. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. analysis of evidence and burden of proof. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. final verdict and dismissal of revision. (Para 23) |
ORDER
1. Record of the Courts below has been received.
2. Heard on the question of admission.
3. Being arguable, present revision is admitted for hearing.
4. This criminal revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Cr.P.C. is filed assailing the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 23.04.2024, passed by learned Sessions Judge, Dewas (M.P.) in Cri.A. No.02/2024 whereby, the judgment dated 07.12.2023, passed in SCNIA No.336/2018 by Ms. Sweta Agrawal Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dewas convicting the revision petitioner/accused Devkaran for offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 was affirmed.
5. For the sake of convenience, revision petitioner Dev
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
