SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 26805

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Abhishek Parashar – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
WP 22185/2023



Advocates:
Abhishek Parashar (Self),Advocate General

Motion Hearing Common Conditional Order In matter notified at Serial No.1001 to 1003 on the board dated 2.11.2023 due to non-compliance of court order Cause Titles and Appearances as notified Sr. Nos.1001 to 1003 is listed with office objection(s).

Gwalior, dated 2.11.2023 The Court proposes to pass this common conditional order to obviate passing of identical conditional order in this matter involving similar office objection/default.

In all this matter, due to non-removal of office objection within the prescribed time as per the Rules, the concerned matter was placed before the Registrar in the first instance. The Registrar granted sufficient time to the petitioner(s) applicant(s)/appellant(s) to cure the defect/office objection, however, due to non-removal of office objection/default within the prescribed time, the concerned matter was required to be once again listed before the Court. The Court granted further time, by passing common order on the earlier occasion.

In spite of repeated opportunity (three times–one under Rules, second by the Registrar and third by Court), the petitioner(s), applicant(s)/appellant(s) has failed to cure the office objection/default. As a result, by way of indulgence and last opportunity, in terms of this order, SIX WEEKS further time is granted to the petitioner(s), applicant(s)/appellant(s) in the respective matters to remove office objection/default and make the matter ready for further hearing within that time, failing which the concerned petition/application/appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court.

Provided, however, in case, where the objection/default is about non-service of any of the respondent, on expiry of the extended period, the concerned matter will stand dismissed for non-prosecution only against the unserved respondent (s), without further reference to the Court. The matter would then proceed against the remaining respondent (s).

In case where the office objection/default has already been cured before passing of this order, it will be open to the concerned party to bring that fact to the notice of the Registrar (Judicial-II), who may examine the same and proceed with the matter as per the listing scheme, if ready for hearing.

If the office objections are removed within the time extended in terms of this order, the concerned matter(s) be made returnable on the date notified hereafter.

Cases as per cause list No. Returnable Date Serial No.1001 to 1003 19/12/23 (Rohit Arya) (Amar Nath (kesharwani))

Judge Judge ar ABDUR RAHMAN

2023.12.02

14:00:30 +05'30'

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top