SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MP) 5660

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Satish Urao – Appellant
Versus
High Court Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Amit Seth,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU &

HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDER SINGH BHATTI ON THE 2nd OF MARCH, 2022 WRIT PETITION No. 3404 of 2022 Between:-

SATISH URAO S/O SHRI RAM SINIGH URAO , AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCCUPATION: UNEMPLOYED R/O KAMBOJ COLONOY, TIGHRA, KHAMARIA, JABALPUR (M.P.) (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....PETITIONER (BY SHRI AMIT SETH, ADVOCATE)

AND HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR

1. GENERAL HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR, M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)

PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HARDA DISTRICT-HARDA

2.

(MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI KHALID NOOR FAKHRUDDIN, ADVOCATE)

This appeal coming on for admission and interim relief this day, Hon’ble Shri Justice Maninder Singh Bhatti passed the following:

ORDER

The petitioner has filed this petition while praying for the following reliefs:-

I. Hon’ble Court may be pleased to call for the relevant records from the possession of the respondents for its kind perusal;

II. Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issued appropriate writ/order/direction quashing the impugned order dated 4.02.2022 (Annexure P/1) passed by the respondent no.2 as ex facie arbitrary and illegal;

III. H

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top