SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MP) 7098

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Virendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ms Nandlal Bhandari – Respondent


Advocates:
Gs,A,Ss,R.Yadav,Smt.R.Bhargava,P.Pal,V.Patwa,Ol.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE COMP No. 8 of 1981 (VIRENDRA SINGH Vs M.S NANDLAL BHANDARI)

Dated : 11-05-2022 Shri Vivek Patwa, counsel for the petitioners.

Shri D. S. Panwar, counsel for the respondent - State Bank of India.

Shri H. Y. Mehta, counsel for official liquidator.

Shri Sitaram S. Gupta, Official Liquidator is present in person.

O R D E R

1] Heard on I.A. No.5948 of 2021, which is an application filed under Rule 9 of the Companies Court Rules, 1959 by the petitioners seeking the following reliefs:-

“a) Declare the judgment and decree obtained by the bank against the applicant as null and void being vitiated by fraud and b) Stay the operation of the proceedings before the Recovery Officer of DRT in Case No.TAEX.74/2002 till the adjudication of the claim and decision of the applications filed by the petitioner as well as Bank in this behalf before this Hon'ble Court.

c) The Official Liquidator be directed to institute appropriate criminal proceedings against the erring officials of the bank for abusing the process of law.

d) That the DRT be directed to withdraw/recall the show cause notice dated 29.06.2021 proposing to attach the property of the HUF, and e) This Hon'

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top