SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MP) 8412

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Piyush Kuamr Rathi – Appellant
Versus
Dr Yogesh Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Sourabh Bhushan Shrivastava,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL ON THE 9th OF JULY, 2022 MISC. PETITION No. 165 of 2018 Between:-

1. PIYUSH KUAMR RATHI S/O KAMAL KISHORE RATHI , AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCCUPATION:

NIL RADHA VALLABH WARD GADARWAR DISTT. NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. SMT. RADHIKA RATHI W/O PIYUSH KUMAR RATHI , AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NIL R/O RADHA VALLABH WARD, GADARWARA (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....PETITIONER (BY SHRI PRATYUSH TRIPATHI, ADVOCATE)

AND

1. DR YOGESH KUMAR S/O SANTOSH KUAMR KOURAV , AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, NEAR NEW GALLA MANDI TEH. GADARWARA DISTT.

NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THR.

COLLECTOR DISTT-NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS (SHRI SHYAM YADAV, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO. 1) (Ms. SUPRIYA SINGH, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO. 2)

This petition coming on for hearing this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

This Miscellaneous petition is filed being aggrieved of order dated st Signature Not Verified 28/11/2017 passed by the learned 1 Civil Judge Class-II, Gadarwara, District SAN Narsinghpur allowing an application under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. filed by the plaintiff in view of the documents which we

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top