SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MP) 8926

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Govind – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Virendra Sharma,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR (VERMA)

ON THE 3rd OF AUGUST, 2022 CRIMINAL REVISION No. 3507 of 2021 Between:-

1. GOVIND S/O PADAM SINGH ANJANA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURE R/O GRAM DENGARKHEDA TEH. MAHIDPUR DISTRICT UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. KULDEEP S/O BALARAM ANJANA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST R/O GRAM DENGARKHEDA, TEHSIL MAHIDPUR DISTRICT UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....PETITIONERS (BY SHRI VIRENDRA SHARMA, ADVOCATE)

AND THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH, 1.

THR. P.S. RAGHVI DISTRICT UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENT (BY SHRI RAHUL SOLANKI, DY.GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)

………...............…………………………………………………………………...

This revision coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

With consent heard finally.

This revision is preferred against the order dated 24.09.2020 passed by the learned IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Mahidpur, district Ujjain in S.T.No.41/2020 by which charges under Sections 306 and 506-

II of IPC have been framed against the petitioners.

Signature Not Verified

2. The facts of the case in brief is that on 27.02.2020 the deceased Pankaj committed suicide by hanging h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top