2022 Supreme(Online)(MP) 10700
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Chanchlesh Singh Thakur – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
MCRC 50901/2022
Dharmendra Patel,Advocate General
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT ON THE 2nd OF NOVEMBER, 2022 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 50901 of 2022 BETWEEN:-
CHANCHLESH SINGH THAKUR S/O SHRI DEVI SINGH THAKUR, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCCUPATION: PATWARI, R/O SIHORAMADKA, TAH. AND DISTT. CHHINDWARA, (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPLICANT (BY SHRI MUKESH KUMAR PANDEY, ADVOCATE AND SHRI DHARMENDRA PATEL, ADVOCATE )
AND THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH P.S. CHOURAI, CHHINDWARA, DISTRICT CHHINDWARA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENT (BY SHRI NARENDRA CHAURASIYA - GOVT. ADVOCATE)
This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
ORDER
This is first bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of applicant in connection with Crime No.693/2022, registered at Police Station Chourai, District Chhindwara (M.P.), for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468/34 of IPC.
Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that applicant is Patwari of the village. Few persons had filed an application for mutation. Applicant did inquiry and on basis of said inquiry, mutation order was passed by Naib Tehsildar. Later on, said mutation order was set aside in appeal.
Signature Not Verified Signed by: SUNIL KUMAR Offence has been registered against the applicant because applicant did not report correct facts before Tehsildar and he had conspired with applicants for getting the mutation done. Counsel for applicant submitted that applicant has not committed an offence. He may be negligent in his work, but he had no intention to commit the crime. Forgery of making a false document has been done by other persons. Applicant had not misrepresented anything on basis of which he had not received any money. Investigation is complete and charge- sheet has already been filed. Applicant is in jail since 29.09.2022. In these circumstances, applicant be released on bail.
Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent/State opposed the application for grant of bail.
Heard the counsel for the parties.
Considering the fact that applicant had not forged any document and he had given a wrong report on basis of which mutation had been done. Considering the gravity of offence committed by the applicant, bail application filed by applicant is allowed It is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.
The applicant shall abide by the conditions enumerated under Section
437(3) of Cr.P.C. C.C as per rules.
(VISHAL DHAGAT)
JUDGE sp/-
Signature Not Verified Signed by: SUNIL KUMAR Signature Not Verified