SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MP) 10710

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Jitendra Salame – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Pradeep Kumar Naveria,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL ON THE 2nd OF NOVEMBER, 2022 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 50854 of 2022 BETWEEN:-

JITENDRA SALAME S/O SHRI DHARAMDAS SALAME, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, OCCUPATION: LABOURER R/O VILLAGE KHAIRI, TEHSIL TIRODA DISTRICT GONDIA (M.H.)

.....APPLICANT (BY SHRI PRAKHAR NAVERIYA, ADVOCATE)

AND THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH P.S. KHAIRLANJI DISTRICT BALAGHAT .....RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI VIVEK LAKHERA, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)

This second bail application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

Shri Shivlal Kewat, Learned Special Judge POCSO Act, Waraseoni, District Balaghat has mentioned name of the prosecutrix in the deposition sheet disclosing her identity. This is against the provisions contained in POCSO Act, so also the directives of Hon'ble Supreme Court in regard to maintenance of the privacy of the prosecutrix. Explanation from the concerned Special Judge be called for that why he has not taken precaution to not to disclose the identity of the prosecutrix. Matter be also placed before Hon'ble the Chief Justice to Signature Not Verified SAN consider whether concerned Special Judge is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top