2022 Supreme(Online)(MP) 11707
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sachin Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Deshraj – Respondent
MCC 93/2021
Sudhir Singh Tomar,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA ON THE 10th OF NOVEMBER, 2022 MISC. CIVIL CASE No. 93 of 2021 BETWEEN:-
1. SACHIN KUMAR S/O SHRI MUNNALAL, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, GRAM AALGI THASIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. YOGESH KUMAR S/O SHRI MUNNALAL, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, VILLAGE ALAGI, TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPLICANTS (BY SHRI RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA - ADVOCATE)
AND
1. DESHRAJ S/O LATE SHRI HAJUA, AGED ABOUT
44 YEARS, GRAM AALGI THASIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. DESHRAJ S/O LATE SHRI HAJUA THR. DIED VARISAN CHHOTELAL S/O LATE DESHRAJ JATAV, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, VILLAGE ALAGI TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. DESHRAJ S/O LATE SHRI HAJUA THR. DIED VARISAN HARDAS S/O LATE DESHRAJ JATAV, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, VILLAGE ALAGI TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
4. DESHRAJ S/O LATE SHRI HAJUA THR. DIED VARISAN RATI W/O LATE SHRI DESHRAJ JATAV, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, VILLAGE ALAGI, TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
5. DESHRAJ S/O LATE SHRI HAJUA THR. DIED VARISAN PUSHPADEVI W/O LATE SHRI DESHRAJ JATAV, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, LALA KE TAL KE PASS (MADHYA PRADESH)
6. MANKUIYA BEBA RAMPA THR. DIED VARISAN LALARAM S/O LATE RAMPA VILLAGE ALAGI, Signature Not Verified TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
7. MANKUIYA BEBA RAMPA THR. DIED VARISAN SHILA W/O KUNJALAL VILLAGE ALAGI TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
8. RAMESH S/O ANCHHUA JATAV, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, VILLAGE ALAGI, TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
9. SHEELA D/O RAMPA JATAV, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, VILLAGE ALAGI, TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
10. MEERA W/O LATE RAMPA JATAV, AGED ABOUT
42 YEARS, VILLAGE ALAGI, TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
11. BHOORI W/O LATE ANCHHUA JATAV, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, VILLAGE ALAGI, TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
12. KAMLA D/O ANCHHUA JATAV, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, VILLAGE ALAGI, TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
13. MAMTA D/O LATE RAGHUWAR JATAV, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, THANE KE PICHHE TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
14. SANGEETA D/O LATE RAGHUWAR JATAV, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, THANE KE SAMNE, TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
15. RAMSEVAK S/O LATE NATTHU SINGH YADAV, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, CHITRA CHAURAHA KE PASS, SIPRI BAZAR (UTTAR PRADESH)
16. SANJAY KUMAR S/O RAMKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, CHITRA CHAURAHA KE PASS, SIPRI BAZAR (UTTAR PRADESH)
17. DHURV ARAJRIYA S/O BHUPENDRA BRAHMAN, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, GOVIND CHAURAHA (UTTAR PRADESH)
18. SANJAY KUMAR S/O LATE RAMKUMA CHAUBEY THR. DIED VARISAN ARCHANA R CHAUBEY W/O LATE SANJAY KUMAR CHAUBEY CHITRA CHAURAHA KE PASS, SIPRI BAZAR (UTTAR PRADESH)
Signature Not Verified
19. SANJAY KUMAR S/O LATE RAMKUMAR CHAUBEY THR. DIED VARISAN PRADHUMN CHAUBEY S/O LATE SANJAY KUMAR CHAUBEY CHITRA CHAURAHA KE PASS, SIPRI BAZAR (UTTAR PRADESH)
20. SANJAY KUMAR S/O LATE RAMKUMAR CHABEY THR. DIED VARISAN SHIVANI D/O LATE SANJAY CHAUBEY CHITRA CHAURAHA KE PASS, SIPRI BAZAR (UTTAR PRADESH)
21. RAJABETI W/O SHIVKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, VILLAGE ALAGI, TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
22. DEEPAK S/O SHIVKUMAR JATAV, AGED ABOUT
26 YEARS, BLOCK KE PICHHE TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
23. JYOTI @ DEVKA D/O SHIVKUMAR JATAV, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, BLOCK KE PICHHE TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
24. LAXMAN S/O HARDEV SINGH JATAV, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, VILAGE ALAGI TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
25. SANTOSH S/O RAGHUWAR JATAV, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, THANE KE SAMNE TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
26. VINOD S/O RAGHUWAR JATAV, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, THANE KE SAMNE TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
27. RAKESH S/O RAGHUWAR JATAV, AGED ABOUT
37 YEARS, THANE KE SAMNE TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
28. VIRENDRA S/O RAGHUWAR JATAV, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, THANE KE SAMNE TEHSIL KARERA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI K. K. SHRIVASTAVA - ADVOCATE)
This application coming on for hearing this day, the court passed the following:
Signature Not Verified
ORDER
Restoration of Miscellaneous Petition No.5185 of 2019 is being sought vide present application. The aforesaid petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Though opposed at by the respondent, however, taking into cons