Back
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
GAJENDRA SINGH, J
MAN SINGH AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court reconsidered the basis for charges and assessed intent. (Para 4) |
| 2. nature of injury is not decisive for charges under section 307 ipc. (Para 6) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAJENDRA SINGH nd ON THE 2 OF JULY, 2025 CRIMINAL REVISION No. 5010 of 2024 MAN SINGH AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:
Shri Virendra Sharma -Senior Advocate with Shri Satish Yadav for the petitioners.
Shri S.S Thakur -G.A for the respondent/State.
ORDER This criminal revision under section 438 of the BNSS, 2023 is preferred challenging the order dated 17.09.2024 in S.T.No.25/2024 by 2nd A.S.J, Mahidpur, district Ujjain whereby charges under sections 147, 148, 307 r/w section 149, 324, 506 Part-II of the IPC have been framed against all the revision petitioners and additional charge under section 25(1-b)(b) of the Arms Act , 1959 has been framed against the revision petitioners Mansingh and Gopal Singh. The charge under section 307 of the IPC has been framed for committing attempt of murder of Pawan Anjana and charge under Signature Not Verified Signed by: HARIKUMAR section 324 IPC has been framed for causing voluntary inj
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
