SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3779

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M/S Geeta Consturuction A Proprietorship Concerned – Appellant
Versus
West Central Railway A Unit Of Indian Railway – Respondent


Advocates:
,Deputy Solicitor General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DEEPAK KHOT nd ON THE 2 OF JULY, 2025 ARBITRATION CASE No. 82 of 2023 M/S GEETA CONSTURUCTION A PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERNED Versus WEST CENTRAL RAILWAY A UNIT OF INDIAN RAILWAY Appearance:

Shri Raghav Sanghi - Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Shrikrishna Sharma - Advocate for the respondent.

ORDER Present application has been filed by the applicant under Section 11(6)

of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1996') for appointment of an Arbitrator to resolve the dispute arose between the parties pursuant to an agreement/letter of acceptance dated

03.01.2022 (Annexure-P/8) (page-69).

2. It is the case of the applicant that the applicant has written a letter dated 17.05.2022 (Annexure-P/12) (page-77) stating therein that the work allotted to the applicant is unattainable due to defaults on the part of the respondent and as such, raised a dispute. It is submitted that in response to the said letter, a termination notice dated 29.06.2022 (Annexure-P/13) (page- 80) has been issued under Clause-62 of the Standard General Conditions of Contract. It is further submitted that in fur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top