HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
DEVNARAYAN MISHRA, J
GURMIT SINGH SAINI – Appellant
Versus
NIRNJAN SINGH – Respondent
Dated :09-07-2025 Shri Sankalp Kochar - Advocate for the applicant in Cr.R.No.2714/2024.
Shri Laxmi Narayan Sakle - Advocate for the applicant in Cr.R.No.5126/2019.
Shri Ashley Johnmathew - Advocate for the respondent in Cr.R.No.5126/2019.
Heard on I.A.Nos.17167/2025 & 16138/2025,which are applications for exemption from surrender before the authorities.
2. Learned counsel for the applicants have submitted that maintainability of revision, it is not mandatory for the applicant to surrender before the Court as per Rule 48 Chapter X of the M.P. High Court Rules, 2008 and the Court can consider the exemption application, in case where it is necessary, in the interest of justice and grant exemption to the applicant from surrendering.
3. Learned counsel Shri Sankalp Kochar has submitted that as per the judgment of this in the case of Sanjay Nagayach Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh passed in Cr.R. No.729 of 2024, dated 20.02.2024, this aspect Signature Not Verified Signed by: VINAY KUMAR has been considered by the coordinate Bench of this Court, but the Court has not considered M.P. High Court Rules.
4. Further, he has relied on the judgment of High Court of Madras passed in the case of Easwaram
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.