Back
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
VIVEK RUSIA, BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI, JJ
SUMITABH – Appellant
Versus
AYUKT, NAGAR PALIKA NIGAM, UJJAIN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ appeals can affirm earlier court decisions based on procedural compliance. (Para 2) |
| 2. termination without following recruitment rules is illegal. (Para 3 , 4) |
Per: Justice Vivek Rusia
1. This order shall govern the disposal of Writ Appeal Nos.729/24, 739/24, 740/24, 741/24, 742/24, 744/24, 745/24, 746/24, 749/24, 751/24 & 755/24. Regard being had to the similitude of the controversy involved in the aforesaid appeals, they are heard analogously and disposed of by this common order.
2. Appellants have filed these appeal challenging the order dated 31.1.2024, whereby the Miscellaneous Petition filed by the Nagar Palika Nigam, Ujjain has been allowed and the order of Labour Court dated
1.7.2020 in Case No.148/2019/ID Act (Reference) has been set aside.
For convenience the facts are being taken from WA No.729/2024:-
3. Nagar Palika Nigam, Ujjain is a local body established under the M.P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 . The appellant approached the Labour Court by way of reference that he was appointed on the post of Daily Wager on 10.3.2016 on fixed salary of Rs.5,500/- per month and after three years in the year 2019 by an oral order he was discontinued from the se
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
