SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 4228

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
DWARKA DHISH BANSAL, J
GOVIND SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 24891 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Rajendra Singh Yadav
For the Respondents: Shri Deependra Singh Kushwaha, Shri Himanshu Chaturvedi

The Court may grant anticipatory bail when the application demonstrates cooperation and non-inducement during trial, despite serious allegations.

Headnote:In this case, the applicant has filed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 482, apprehending arrest for offenses under IPC Sections 419, 420, 406, 467, 468, and 471 registered as Crime No.11. The Court accepted the bail application with conditions, allowing bail upon deposit and assurance of cooperation during trial. The issue addressed was the applicant's false implication due to family disputes. The Court reasoned that the applicant's willingness to cooperate justifies the bail grant. Ultimately, the application for bail is allowed subject to specified terms.

Table of Content
1. application filed under section 482 for anticipatory bail. (Para 1 , 2)
2. counsel argues applicant's false implication and readiness to cooperate. (Para 3)

ORDER

1.The applicant has filed this first application under Section 482 of BNSS for grant of anticipatory bail.

2. Applicant apprehends arrest in connection with offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 of I.P.C. registered as Crime No.11 of 2024 at Police Station Kampoo, District Gwalior.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has not committed any offence and he has falsely been implicated in the case. He further submits that the complainant in the present case is younger brother of the applicant, who filed a false case against the applicant due to family disputes. It is further submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the applicant is ready and willing to co-operate in the investigation and shall Signature Not Verified Signed by: NEETU abide by all the terms and conditions as may be imposed by this Court and he is ready to deposit the amount of Rs.30,000/-(Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) before the trial court in CCD; therefore, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for State as well as counsel for the complainant opposed the bail application and prays for dismissal of the bail application.

5. Heard both the parties.

6. In view of the above, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, is inclined to extend the benefit of bail to the applicant. Accordingly, bail application u/S 482 of BNSS is allowed in the following terms.

7. It is directed that in the event of arrest the applicant be released on bail subject subject to deposit of Rs.30,000/- in cash before trial court in CCD within seven days from today and upon his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Arresting Authority.

8. This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicants:-

i. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him/her;

ii. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

iii. The applicant will not indulge himself/herself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

iv. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which she is Signature Not Verified Signed by: NEETU accused;

v. The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and vi. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

9. It is made clear that the amount so deposited be kept in FDR in a nationalized bank and the same shall be disbursed to the person who is found entitled after completion of the trial.

10. A copy of this order be sent to the Court concerned for compliance.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top