SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 4366

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sundar Babu Saxena – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr – Respondent


Advocates:
Raghvendra Dixit,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE th ON THE 14 OF JULY, 2025 WRIT PETITION No. 7289 of 2015 SUNDAR BABU SAXENA Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THR AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Raghvendra Dixit - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri M.S. Jadon - Govt. Advocate for the State.

Shri Raj Bahadur Singh Tomar - Advocate for the respondent No.3.

ORDER The present petition, under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, has been filed by the petitioner seeking following reliefs:

"i- That, recovery order and order of forfeiting the amount of retrial dues like pension, gratuity, arrears of 6th pay, security amount etc. payable to petitioner (Ann. P/1 and P/2) may kindly be quashed.

ii- That, so called enquiry initiated by them after petitioner's retirement may kindly be dropped/quashed, consequently respondents may kindly be directed to pay retrial dues like pension, gratuity, arrears of 6th pay, security amount etc. of petitioner on account of his retirement forthwith along with interest of 18% per annum.

Signature Not Verified iii-That, cost and any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, may kindly, be awarded in the i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top