HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AMIT SETH, J
SATENDRA YADAV – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. presence of direct evidence is crucial in bail applications. (Para 1 , 2) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT SETH th ON THE 20 OF JUNE, 2025 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 25654 of 2025 SATENDRA YADAV Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:
Shri S.S.Rajput - Advocate for the applicant.
Shri Saket Udainiya - Public Prosecutor for respondent/State.
ORDER This is the first application under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the applicant who apprehends his arrest in connection with Crime No.549/2025 registered at Police Station Cantt, District Guna (M.P.) for the alleged commission of offence under Sections 112 of BNS and Section 4(a) of Public Gambling Act , 1976.
2. As per the prosecution story, on the information being received, the police party of Police Station Cantt, Guna, reached the ground in front of Rajput Dental Hospital where they found one boy, namely, Dashrath, was doing something in his mobile. Upon inquiry, the mobile was recovered which revealed that he was indulged in online gambling/satta of the IPL cricket match. The record of the victories/d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.