Back
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
ATUL SREEDHARAN, AMIT SETH, JJ
RAJNEESH CHATURVEDI – Appellant
Versus
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. necessity for reasoned orders in the judiciary. (Para 1 , 4 , 15) |
| 2. implications of frivolous complaints against judges. (Para 2 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. judicial orders must reflect the application of mind. (Para 3 , 8 , 14) |
| 4. judicial reasoning and accountability are crucial. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
ORDER
Per: Justice Atul Sreedharan The present petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 18/05/2024 passed by respondent No.1, whereby the High Court filed the complaint (as non-actionable) preferred by the petitioner against a Judge of the District Judiciary (respondent No. 2 herein) without giving any reasons.
2. The petitioner in this case was prosecuted and tried before respondent No.2 Ms. Khalida Tanveer, the then Judicial Magistrate First Class, Umariya, interalia for an offence under Sections 332 IPC (for which he was convicted). The petitioner was proceeded against on the basis of FIR being Crime No.12/2015, Police Station Umariya Kotwali, District Umariya, which led to the registration of RCT No.600115/2015 in which the petitioner was tried and acquitted for offences under Sections 294 and 506 (II) IPC, but was held guilty for offence under Section
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
