SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 4621

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rovindra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Smt.Murti Bai – Respondent


Advocates:
Ajeet Kumar Rawat,Parijat Sharma,Advocate General

ORDER

Heard on the question of admission.

2. This Second Appeal, under Section 100 of CPC , has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 26.11.2010 passed by Additional Judge to the Court of I Additional District Judge, Datia 3in Civil Appeal No.36-A/2008 as well as judgment and decree dated 10.09.2008 passed by Additional Judge, Bhander to the Court of First Civil Judge, Class II, Datia in Civil Appeal No.18-A/2005.

3. The facts necessary for disposal of the present appeal, in short, are that Smt. Murti Bai/respondent filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction.

4. It is the case of plaintiff that her husband Late Mohan Lal had half share in Survey Nos.207, 213, 214, 219 Min., 263 Min., 283 Min., 287 Min., 289, 379, 383, 510, 525 total area 10.44 hectares situated at Village Pyaval, Tahsil Bhander, District Datia. Husband of plaintiff expired on 20.07.2001 without executing any Will. Plaintiff is the sole legal representative as plaintiff and Mohan Lal had no issue. After the death of Mohan Lal, plaintiff being the sole owner is in exclusive possession of the property in dispute. Dayaram is the brother of Mohan Lal who has also expired. The defendant No.1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top