SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 4680

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
ACHAL KUMAR PALIWAL, J
ATUL BARANGE – Appellant
Versus
NARENDRA SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant: Ayush Choubey
For the Respondents:

Table of Content
1. filing of appeal under section 372 by victim in cheque bounce cases. (Para 1 , 2)
2. clarification on appeal maintainability and procedural rights under the law. (Para 3 , 4)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ACHAL KUMAR PALIWAL th ON THE 18 OF JULY, 2025 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 6514 of 2025 ATUL BARANGE Versus NARENDRA SINGH Appearance:

Shri Ayush Choubey - Advocate for appellant.

ORDER This appeal has been filed under Section Section 419 /419(4) of BNSS by “victim” of an offence as defined under Section 138 of N.I. Act against judgment dated 29.05.2025 passed by JMFC, Timarni District Harda in SCNIA No. 386/2019 whereby respondent/accused has been acquitted of an offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that present appeal cannot be filed before Sessions Court under Proviso to Section 413 of BNSS, as in the instant case appellant's complaint was dismissed for want of prosecution whereas i n Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc. , 2025 SCC Online SC 1320, complainant's complaint was dismissed on merits. Therefore, principle of law down in Celestium Financial (supra) is not appli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top