HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
VIVEK RUSIA, BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI, JJ
SMT. SUNITA SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
MURALILAL SHARMA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks review of divorce decree. (Para 1) |
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI th ON THE 28 OF JULY, 2025 REVIEW PETITION No. 339 of 2025 SMT. SUNITA SHARMA Versus MURALILAL SHARMA Appearance:
Shri Shivam Gaor, learned counsel appears through V.C. and Ms. Surbhi Shimpi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Dr. Vivek Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent.
ORDER Per: Justice Binod Kumar Dwivedi This Review Petition has been filed by the petitioner for review of judgment and order dated 30.09.2024 passed in First Appeal No. 587/2007 whereby First Appeal filed by appellant-husband has been allowed and decree of divorce has been granted against the petitioner.
02. All the grounds taken in Review Petition has been considered while passing the impugned judgment. The grounds taken by the petitioner suggest that other view was also possible whereby different conclusion could have been arrived at, but these grounds cannot be raised in Review Petition which is governed by the provisions under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 of CPC. The error which is not self-evident and has to be detected by a Signature Not Verified Signed by: SOUMYA process of reasoning, c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.