SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 5000

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
VIVEK JAIN, J
SMT. PUSHPLATA PATHAK – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: None
For the Respondents: Shri Suyash Thakur

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN th ON THE 29 OF JULY, 2025 WRIT PETITION No. 7017 of 2022 SMT. PUSHPLATA PATHAK Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

None appeared for petitioner.

Shri Suyash Thakur Government Advocate for the respondent-State.

ORDER The petitioner is a retired Supervisor of Women and Child Development Department. He retired on 30.06.2021. Challenge is made to recovery order Annexure P/1 whereby an amount of Rs. 1,59,017/- has been ordered to be recovered from the petitioner upon his retirement as an amount of erroneous payment made to the petitioner as a result of wrong fixation.

Recovery is for the period from 01.01.2006 to 01.04.2021.

2. The respondents have defended the recovery on the ground that the petitioner had submitted undertaking on 24.09.2018.

3. Upon consideration of the documents placed on record and arguments of respondents, it is evident that the petitioner that he is a retired class-III employee and no fraud, suppression or mis-representation is pleaded against the petitioner. The erroneous payment was made from 01.01.2006 onwards whereas the undertaking has been taken sometime i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top