SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(MP) 655

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Dilip Kumar Rahira – Appellant
Versus
Santa Kanwarram Grih Nirman Sahakari Samiti – Respondent


Advocates:
S.Gulatee,Advocate General

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR

Case No. Civil Revision No.345/2012
Parties Name Dilip Kumar Rahira Vs. Santa Kanwarram Griha Nirman Sahakari Samiti and others
Date of Judgment 15/03/18
Bench Constituted Single Bench.
Judgment delivered by Justice Sujoy Paul
Whether approved for reporting Yes
Name of counsels for parties For applicant: Shri Siddharth Gulatee, Advocate. For Respondent No.5: Ms. Ankita Khare, Advocate. For Respondent No.7: Shri Pankaj Raj, Advocate. For State: Shri Sudeep Chatarjee, Govt. Advocate.
Law laid down 1. Section 401 of Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 – This Section can be pressed into service when a person is acting under the direction of Corporation, the Mayor-in-Council or Municipal Officer or servant and such act done purporting to have been done in pursuance or execution of this act than only such person is covered. The defendant no.1 cannot be treated to be such person. 2. Cause of action – is bundle of facts. If plaint discloses a cause of action against defendant No.1 who is not a person under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top