IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Anusuiya Daharwal – Appellant
Versus
Govind Ram @ Tappu – Respondent
Criminal Revision No.2895/2016 Anusuiya Daharwal Applicant VERSUS Govind Ram @ Tappu Kadve and five others.
Respondents
11/01/2017 Shri Ajay Jain, learned counsel for the applicant.
None for respondent Nos. 1 to 5/accused-persons.
Shri Y.D. Yadav, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent No.6-State.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties present, the matter is finally heard at the motion stage after admitting it.
O R D E R
The applicant-complainant has filed this criminal revision under Section 397 r.w. 401 of the Cr.P.C. against the order dated 16.09.2016 passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge Varaseoni, District Balaghat under Section 228(1)(a) Cr.P.C. in Sessions Trial No.2400134/2016.
2. The short facts of the case are that in the night of 04.02.2016, applicant-complainant Anusuiya aged about 48 years was sleeping with her grand daughter in her house situated in village Kankigaya. At about 11:00 p.m. she heard noise of people and sound of stone-pelting coming from outside of her house. As a result, she woke up and came out of her house. She saw that respondent Nos.1 to 5/accused persons namely, Govind Ram @ Tappu, Damodar, Ravindra @ Sonu, Alam Singh and Devkibai we
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.