SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(MP) 72

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Anusuiya Daharwal – Appellant
Versus
Govind Ram @ Tappu – Respondent


Advocates:
Ajay Kumar Jain,Advocate General

Criminal Revision No.2895/2016 Anusuiya Daharwal Applicant VERSUS Govind Ram @ Tappu Kadve and five others.

Respondents

11/01/2017 Shri Ajay Jain, learned counsel for the applicant.

None for respondent Nos. 1 to 5/accused-persons.

Shri Y.D. Yadav, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent No.6-State.

With the consent of learned counsel for the parties present, the matter is finally heard at the motion stage after admitting it.

O R D E R

The applicant-complainant has filed this criminal revision under Section 397 r.w. 401 of the Cr.P.C. against the order dated 16.09.2016 passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge Varaseoni, District Balaghat under Section 228(1)(a) Cr.P.C. in Sessions Trial No.2400134/2016.

2. The short facts of the case are that in the night of 04.02.2016, applicant-complainant Anusuiya aged about 48 years was sleeping with her grand daughter in her house situated in village Kankigaya. At about 11:00 p.m. she heard noise of people and sound of stone-pelting coming from outside of her house. As a result, she woke up and came out of her house. She saw that respondent Nos.1 to 5/accused persons namely, Govind Ram @ Tappu, Damodar, Ravindra @ Sonu, Alam Singh and Devkibai we

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top