Back
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vivek Agarwal, Devnarayan Mishra, JJ
Pradip @ Rajeev Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's jurisdiction and process acknowledgment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. chronology of events leading to abduction. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. procedural actions taken post-abduction. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. witness testimonies on abduction details. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. allegations against each accused party. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. cross-examination clarifying witness inconsistencies. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. scrutiny of evidence against each party. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. discussion on evidentiary standards. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 9. legal implications of evidence presented. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 10. court's findings on arguments made. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 11. final judgment's rationale against each accused. (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
Judgment Reserved On : 25.7.2025
Judgment Pronounced On : 10.9.2025
Criminal Appeal No.2279/2015, Criminal Appeal No.2537/2015 and Criminal Appeal No.2799/2015 under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “ Cr.P.C ”) are filed being aggrieved of judgment dated st 29.7.2015 passed by learned 1 Additional Sessions Judge, Khandwa in Sessions Trial No.199/2013 (First Supplementary) convicting & sentencing the appellants, namely, Sudhir @ Rajsingh
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
