Back
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI, J
SMT.CHANDRAKALA MALU – Appellant
Versus
KAPIL YADAV – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the appeal initiated by the victim. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. question regarding the appeal's maintainability. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's reliance on precedents for victim's rights. (Para 4) |
| 4. affirmation of victim's appeal rights under existing law. (Para 6) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI st ON THE 1 OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 8172 of 2025 SMT.CHANDRAKALA MALU Versus KAPIL YADAV Appearance:
Shri Prashant Kumar Singh - Advocate for the appellant.
Shri Ravindra Shukla - Government Advocate for the State.
ORDER This appeal has been filed under Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by “victim” of an offence as defined under Section 138 of N.I. Act against judgment dated 23.07.2025 passed by JMFC, Seoni (M.P.) in SC NIA No.195/2023, whereby respondent/accused has been acquitted of an offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act.
2. Aforesaid criminal case was instituted on the basis of private complaint filed by the victim/appellant.
3. The question before this Court is whether instant appeal is covered under proviso to section 413 of BNSS (372 of Cr.P.C.).
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
