Back
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Deepak Khot, J
M.P. State Agro Industries Development Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Santosh Puri – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner contests orders of labour court regarding wages. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. appellant claims exceedance of jurisdiction by courts. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court affirms labour court's powers under m.p.i.r. act. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 14) |
| 4. final decision on supervisory jurisdiction under article 227. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 5. court dismisses petition with cost. (Para 23 , 24) |
ORDER
With the consent of parties the matters are heard finally.
2. Considering the similitude of facts of all the above cases, viz. W.P.No.7510/2007, W.P.No.7511/2007, W.P.No.7512/2007, M.P.No.6210/2018, M.P.No.6211/2018 and M.P.No.6215/2018, as in all the cases petitioner M.P. State Agro Industries Development Corporation has challenged the order of the Industrial Court dated 29.11.2006 (in W.P.No.7510/2007, W.P.No.7511/2007, W.P.No.7512/2007) and order dated 22.11.2018 (in M.P.No.6210/2018, M.P.No.6211/2018 and M.P.No.6215/2018), whereby the order of Labour Court dated 2.8.2005 (in W.P.No.7510/2007, W.P.No.7511/2007, W.P.No.7512/2007) and order dated 2.2.2018 (in M.P.No.6210/2018, M.P.No.6211/2018 and M.P.No.6215/2018) has been affirmed and the application of the employee workman for grant of difference a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
