HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
GAJENDRA SINGH, J
VIJAY – Appellant
Versus
SMT. HEENA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court observed financial requirements necessitating adjustments. (Para 1) |
| 2. facts of the case established employment and financial status. (Para 2) |
Heard on IA No.12852/2025, application for condonation of delay in CRR No.4996/2024. The revision is barred by 217 days.
For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed and the delay is condoned.
With consent of parties, heard finally.
ORDER Both the criminal revisions have been filed under section
19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 being aggrieved by the order dated 22.11.2023 in MJCR No.82/2023 by Principal Judge, Family Court, West Nimar, Mandleshwar, whereby an amount of Rs.4,000/- per month to wife Smt.Hina and Rs.3,000/- each per month to minor children Vranda and Tulsi have been awarded as maintenance from the date of application.
2. Facts in brief are that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 06.06.2015 as per Hindu rituals and customs. On 13.10.2017 twin girl children were born to the couple and wife is residing separately since 17.06.2021 and the minor children are also residing with the wife. The husband Vijay Verma is working as 4th Signature Not Verified Signed by: HARIKUMAR class e
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.