HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
B. P. SHARMA, J
JITENDRA @ JITAI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2669 of 2013
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties discuss compromise and sentencing. (Para 4) |
ORDER With consent, arguments are heard finally.
Appellant has preferred this Criminal Appeal under Section 374 (2)
of Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973, assailing the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 20.08.2013 passed by the learned th X Additional Sessions Judge, Jabalpur (MP) in Sessions Trial No.354/2012 (State of MP Vs. Manoj Sonkhare @ Others) whereby appellant has been convicted for commission of offence under Sections 148 , 307/149 of IPC and Section 25(1-B)(b) of the Arms Act and has been sentenced to undergo RI for one year with fine of Rs.1,000/-, RI for seven years with fine of Rs.10,000/- and RI for one year with fine of Rs.1,000/- respectively, with default stipulations. All the sentences are directed to run concurrently.
Signature Not Verified Signed by: ASHISH KUMAR
2. Relevant facts, briefly stated are that on the basis of report lodged, FIR was registered. After completion of investigation, charge- sheet has been filed before the competent Court. Charges were framed against the appellant(s)/accused. Accused has refuted the charge and claimed to be tried. Statements of the witnesses were recorded. After recording the statements of prosecution witnesses and appreciating the evidence led by the parties, learned Trial Court found the appellant guilty for commission of aforementioned offence and convicted & sentenced him as mentioned preceding paragraph No.1. Being aggrieved with the impugned judgment, the appellant/accused has preferred this criminal appeal before this Court.
3. During the pendency of this appeal, I.A. No.1228/2024 & I.A.
No.1229/2024-applications under Section 320 of CrPC seeking leave to compound offence as also for compromise have been filed stating that dispute between the parties have been resolved and they have entered into compromise with no intention to pursue the matter further. The applications are duly supported by affidavit of complainant Moshim.
4. Vide order dated 11.09.2025, matter was referred to the Registrar (Judicial-II) of this Court for verification of compromise. Registrar (Judicial-II) in compliance of this Court's order has verified the aforesaid compromise and has submitted the report dated 24.09.2025 wherein it is mentioned that parties have amicably settled their dispute Signature Not Verified Signed by: ASHISH KUMAR and have arrived at compromise on their own free will & volition and without any threat, inducement or coercion to settle their dispute and the compromise is voluntarily. Appellants/accused and complainant have been duly identified by their respective counsel.
5. The purpose of compromise is to maintain peace and harmony in the relations. Section 320 of CrPC deals with compounding of offence.
6. On the basis of the verification report dated 24.09.2025 furnished by Registrar (Judicial-II), this Court is satisfied that the parties have arrived at a compromise on their free-will and volition. However, the appellant was convicted and sentenced for the offence punishable under Sections 148 , 307/149 of IPC and Section 25(1-B)(b) of the Arms Act , which are non-compoundable offence.
7. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he does not want to challenge the conviction of the appellant recorded under Sections 148 , 307/149 of IPC and Section 25(1-B)(b) of the Arms Act by the Trial Court, but has prayed for reduction of jail sentence. It is submitted that the incident had taken place in the year 2012 i.e. almost 13 years ago. It is further submitted that appellant was in custody from 22.02.2012 to 20.08.2013 (almost six months) during trial. He has already served out the jail sentence from the date of judgment i.e. 20.08.2013 to 11.11.2013 i.e. the date of suspension of his jail sentence (almost three months). Thus; in total, appellant has suffered the Signature Not Verified Signed by: ASHISH KUMAR incarceration for a period of more than nine months so far in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.