SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 6593

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI, J
SMT.ARTI SEN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Rakshit Parmar
For the Respondents:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI ON THE 24th OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2284 of 2022 SMT.ARTI SEN Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Rakshit Parmar - Advocate for the appellant.

ORDER Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and after perusal of record, it reveals that this criminal appeal has been filed under Section 413 of BNSS , 2023 / 372 of Cr.P.C., being aggrieved with the judgement dated 07.12.2021 passed by the JMFC, Damoh in RCT No.2402561/2013, whereby respondent No.2/accused Rahul Gupta has been acquitted from the offence under Section s 279 and 304-A of IPC and Section 146/196 of Motor Vehicle Act and respondent No.3/accused Ashok Gupta has been acquitted from the offence under Section 146/196 of Motor Vehicle Act .

2. Section 413 reads as follows:

"413. No appeal to lie unless otherwise provided--. No appeal shall lie from any judgment or order of a Criminal Court except as provided for by this Sanhita or by any other law for the time being in force:

Provided that the victim shall have a right to prefer an appeal against any order passed by the Court acquitting t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top