SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 6974

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI, J
SANTOSH – Appellant
Versus
SITARAM – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Anmol Rawat
For the Respondents:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI

th

ON THE 16 OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 7143 of 2019 SANTOSH Versus SITARAM Appearance:

Shri Anmol Rawat - Advocate for the appellant.

ORDER Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and after perusal of record, it reveals that this criminal appeal has been filed under Section 413 of BNSS , 2023 / 372 of Cr.P.C. , being aggrieved with the judgement dated 22.07.2019 passed by the JMFC, Burhanpur, District Burhanpur in Complaint Case No.Un/19, whereby the complaint case filed by the applicant under Section 203 of Cr.P.C. was dismissed by the trial Court.

2. Section 413 reads as follows:

"413. No appeal to lie unless otherwise provided--. No appeal shall lie from any judgment or order of a Criminal Court except as provided for by this Sanhita or by any other law for the time being in force:

Provided that the victim shall have a right to prefer an appeal against any order passed by the Court acquitting the accused or convicting for a lesser offence or imposing inadequate compensation, and such appeal Signature Not Verified shall lie to the Court to which an appeal ordinarily

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top