Back
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
RAMKUMAR CHOUBEY, J
SMT. JAIKUNWAR YADAV – Appellant
Versus
BRIJKISHOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to set aside conviction due to a settlement. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties agree on settlement terms in the court. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court examines the maintainability of the petition. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. compromise and maintainability of a writ. (Para 10) |
| 5. court finds the petition not maintainable without procedural compliance. (Para 12 , 16) |
| 6. jurisdictional reviews and procedures for compounding. (Para 13) |
O R D E R
This writ petition was listed before this Court along with Criminal Revision No.2141/2025. Heard on the question of maintainability.
2. The instant Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner (wife of the original complainant since dead) against the judgment dated 16.1.2017 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Tikamgarh (M.P.) in Criminal Case No.41/2014 whereby the learned Judicial Magistrate has convicted the respondent (accused before the trial Court) for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one year with compensation of Rs.65,000/- with default stipulation.
3. The present writ petition has been fi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
