Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
VIVEK JAIN, J
LOCHAN SINGH TIDGAAM AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to recovery orders citing inadequate hearing. (Para 2) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN
ON THE 24 OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 WRIT PETITION No. 1524 of 2024 LOCHAN SINGH TIDGAAM AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION No. 1529 of 2024 VIRENDRA NAGPURE AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS WRIT PETITION No. 22669 of 2024 DHANRAJ DAMAHE Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:
Shri Vijay Chandra Rai - Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri Akshansh Shrivastava Panel Lawyer for the respondent-State.
ORDER All these cases relate to same matter, therefore, they were analogously heard and are being decided by this common order.
2. In W.P. No. 1524 of 2024 and W.P. No. 1529 of 2024, the orders passed under Section 89 of the M.P. Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam 1993 has been put to challenge whereby recovery has been ordered against the petitioners therein. In W.P. No. 22669 of 2024, the Signature Not Verified Signed by: ARVIND KUMAR order of dismissal of the petitioner therein is put to challenge who was working on the post of Gram Rojgar Saha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
