IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PAVAN KUMAR DWIVEDI MISC. APPEAL No. 2990 of 2025 SHRI BUILDERES DHAR THROUGH SMT. KUSUMLATA AND OTHERS Versus SMT. PEMIBAI AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri V.K. Jain, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Arpan Jain and Sahket Yadav, learned counsel for the appellants.

Shri Ajay Bagadia, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Piyush Dubey, learned counsel appeared for the caveator.

Shri Anand Bhatt, learned Government Advocate for respondent No.6 /

State.

ORDER Reserved on : 15.09.2025 Pronounced on : 14.10.2025 The present appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 27.02.2025, passed in Regular Civil Appeal No.39/2023, whereby the first appeal filed by respondent No.1 was allowed and the matter was remanded back to the learned trial Court.

1.1. The judgment and decree was passed by the trial Court on

03.01.2023, thereafter, the original plaintiff died on 26.03.2023, hence her legal representative / son Gorelal filed First Appeal before the appellate Court on 09.05.2023 along with affidavits of other legal heirs for expressing no objection on filing appeal by Gorelal.

Signature Not Verified Signed by: ANUSHREE

2. The relevant facts of the case are that respondent No.1 filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction for the following reliefs :

"(अ) यह घो(cid:6)षत (cid:9)कया जावे (cid:9)क दा(cid:6)वया भूिम वा(cid:9)दया के मालक(cid:21), क(cid:22)जे क(cid:21), (cid:23)ाम-जेतपुरा, तहसील व (cid:29)जला धार क(cid:21), पड़त- कृ(cid:6)ष भूिम, सव (cid:33)नंबर 81/2 (इ(cid:38)यासी बटे दो) रकबा 1.834 हे. (एक पा(cid:42)ट आठ सौ चौतीस हे.), लगान 5.52 (cid:48). (पांच (cid:48)पये बावन पैसे) पर (cid:50)ितवाद(cid:51)गण ने, अपना-नामांतरण रेवे(cid:53)यू कमच(cid:54) ार(cid:51) एवं अिधका(cid:55)रय(cid:56) से िमलकर-जुलकर तथा अवैध (cid:48)प से, (cid:6)बना, (cid:9)कसी अिधकार से, सांठ गांठ, छलिछ(cid:59) कपट करके करवा िलया है, वह वा(cid:9)दया पर बंधनकारक नह(cid:51)ं होकर, इससे, उ(cid:53)ह(cid:61) कोई भूिम(cid:63)वामी के अिधकार (cid:50)ा(cid:64) नह(cid:51)ं हो जाते है

और वा(cid:9)दया के मुकाबले म(cid:61) शू(cid:53)य और (cid:67)यथ (cid:54)होकर िनर(cid:63)त (cid:9)कये जावे।

(ब) यह (cid:9)क, वा(cid:9)दया के प(cid:69) म(cid:61) (cid:50)ितवाद(cid:51)गण के (cid:6)व(cid:48)(cid:70), इस-आशय क(cid:21)। (cid:63)थायी िनषेधा(cid:71)ा (cid:50)चिलत क(cid:21) जावे (cid:9)क, (cid:50)ितवाद(cid:51)गण दा(cid:6)वया-भूिम, को, कृ(cid:6)ष-िभ(cid:53)न (cid:50)योजन- हेत ु प(cid:55)रवितत(cid:54) नह(cid:51)ं कराव(cid:61) और उस पर कॉलोनी का (cid:6)वकास नह(cid:51)ं कर(cid:61) एवं न ह(cid:51) (cid:9)कसी को अतं (cid:55)रत, भा(cid:55)रत कर(cid:61) तथा वा(cid:9)दया के क(cid:22)जे म(cid:61), अवैध, ह(cid:63)त(cid:69)ेप नह(cid:51)ं करे, न तो, ऐसा, (cid:50)ितवाद(cid:51)गण (cid:63)वयं ऐसा

कर(cid:61), और न ह(cid:51) अ(cid:53)य(cid:56) से कराव(cid:61)।

(स) यह (cid:9)क दावे का खचा (cid:54)(cid:9)दलाया जावे

(द) इसके अित(cid:55)र(cid:75), अ(cid:53)य कोई सहायता जो, (cid:53)यायालय, (cid:53)याय तथा सा(cid:76)य के आधार पर कानूनन, (cid:9)दलवाना, उिचत समझे, वह भी (cid:9)दलाई जाव(cid:61)।"

3. The original plaintiff / respondent No.1 stated in her plaint that she was the owner and in possession of agricultural land bearing Survey No.81/2 admeasuring 1.834 hectares situated in Village Jaitpura, Tehsil and District Dhar.

4. She further pleaded that she is a widow and an elderly person. Her son had gone to Gujarat for business around 8 to 10 years ago,due to which she lived alone in Dhar. Later, she also went to Gujarat and her other son, who held her power of attorney was taking care of her agricultural land in her absence.

5. It was also pleaded that the defendants / appellants, taking advantage of her absence, in connivance with revenue officials, got their names mutated in the revenue records in respect of the land of the plaintiff.

However, she continued to remain in possession of the suit property.

Signature Not Verified Signed by: ANUSHREE

6. She further pleaded in the plaint that, as soon as she became aware of the defendants'