SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ANIL KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent


1

THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

MCRC No.61275/2021

Anil Kumar Sharma Vs. State of MP and anr.

Through Video Conferencing

Gwalior, Dated : 14/01/2022

Shri Sunil Kumar Jain, learned counsel for the applicant.

Shri Rajeev Upadhyay, learned counsel for the respondent No.

1/State.

Shri S.D.S.Bhadauriya, learned counsel for the respondent

No.2.

This second application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been

filed for quashing the FIR in Crime No.424/2020 registered at Police

Station Kotwali, District Shivpuri for offence under Section 420 of

IPC.

It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that according

to the prosecution case, an agreement to sale a piece of land was

executed by the complainant in favour of the applicant. When the

cheques issued by the applicant were not encashed, then it is alleged

that the applicant issued non CTS cheque (cheques which were

already discontinued by the Reserve Bank of India), as a result, even

those cheques stood bounced. It is submitted that although, the

application filed by the applicant under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for

quashment of FIR in Crime No.424/2020 has already been dismissed

by this Court by a detailed order

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top