SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 7887

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Dhaniram – Appellant
Versus
Ram Dayal – Respondent


Advocates:
Prashant Sharma,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. AHLUWALIA

th

ON THE 27 OF OCTOBER, 2025 SECOND APPEAL No. 1661 of 2018 DHANIRAM Versus RAM DAYAL AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Prashant Sharma - Advocate for the appellant.

Shri Akshat Kumar Jain - Advocate for the respondents 1-4.

Shri Sanjay Singh Kushwaha - Government Advocate for the respondent 5/State.

JUDGMENT Heard through video conferencing.

2. This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 9/5/2018 passed by Sixth Additional District Judge, Shivpuri, District Shivpuri in Civil Appeal No.34/2015, by which the judgment and decree dated 9/7/2015 passed by Civil Judge, Class-

II, Pohari, District Shivpuri in RCSA No.8A/2014 has been modified.

3. The appellant is the plaintiff, who has suffered modification of decree by the First Appellate Court.

4. The facts necessary for disposal of the present appeal in short are that the plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of contract in respect of land bearing survey No.205 area 0.99 hectare situated in village Nagar, Signature Not Verified Signed by: ARUN KUMAR Tehsil Pohari, District Shivpuri. It was his case

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top