SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 7910

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
GAJENDRA SINGH, J
SHEKH JAVED – Appellant
Versus
SADIK SHEKH – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant: Ms. Rekha Shrivastava

ORDER

Heard on the question of maintainability.

02. This appeal under Section 419(4) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (earlier Section 378 (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973) is preferred by the complainant challenging the acquittal of the respondent/accused from the charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act , 1881 (hereinafter referred as "138 of the Act of 1881") in SCNIA/138/2021 by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Khargone (M.P.) alongwith I.A.No.14948/2025 for grant of leave to appeal.

03. The Supreme Court in the matter of M/s. Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc. reported in 2025 INSC 804 held that the complainant in a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Act of 1881 is also a victim as defined in Section 2(wa) of Cr.P.C. corresponding to Section 2(y) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023. The Supreme Court has further held that the complainant in a complaint under Section 138 of the N.I. Act of 1881 can also be entitled to file an appeal under proviso to Section 372 of the Cr.P.C. corresponding to Section 413 of the BNSS.

04. Relevant portion of the aforesaid judgment is reproduced as under:-

"7. xxx xxx xxx

7

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top