SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 8770

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Anantram Kachhi – Appellant
Versus
Sattu Kachhi – Respondent


Advocates:
Sandeep Kumar Mishra,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN

th

ON THE 14 OF NOVEMBER, 2025 MISC. PETITION No. 7239 of 2023 ANANTRAM KACHHI Versus SATTU KACHHI AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Sandeep Kumar Mishra- Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Saurabh Singh Thakur- Advocate for the respondents.

ORDER In view of the recent judgment of coordinate Bench in W.P. No.

31235/2024 (Pradeep Kumar Lal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & others) the application for conversion of MP into W.P. is rejected because miscellaneous appeal is maintainable.

2. Heard on merits.

3. By way of this petition challenge is made to order Annexure P/1 dated 08.11.2023 whereby the Additional Commissioner has directed mutation to take place on the basis of the will. The will is a disputed will because it is disputed by the other side which is not a beneficiary to the will.

4. Recently the matter in respect of the mutation on the basis of disputed will has been decided by Full Bench of this Court in W.P. No.

3499/2022 dated 14.02.2025 in the following manner:-

"75. In view of the aforesaid discussion, we answer the question referred to us in the negative and hold that Tehsildar cannot reject the app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top