SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 8864

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Gaya Prasad Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Vandana Yadav – Respondent


Advocates:
Aman Gupta,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT &

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B. P. SHARMA

th

ON THE 29 OF OCTOBER, 2025 FIRST APPEAL No. 320 of 2021 GAYA PRASAD YADAV Versus SMT. VANDANA YADAV AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Aman Gupta - Advocate for the appellant.

None for the respondent.

ORDER Per: Justice B. P. Sharma Appellant had filed this appeal under Section 19 of Family Court Act, 1984 read with Section 47 of the Guardians and Wards Act, against judgment and decree dated 18.2.2021 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Tikamgarh (MP) in Hindu Marriage Case No.105/2016 whereby an application under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, filed by appellant, has been rejected.

2. Briefly stated, the case of the appellant/husband before the Trial Court was that his marriage with the respondent/wife was solemnized on 06.06.2011 as per Hindu rites and rituals. It is alleged that after about eight days of the marriage, the respondent returned to her parental home and came back to her matrimonial home only on 10.02.2012, after a period of about six to seven months. She again stayed for about eight days and, on 17.02.2012, returned to her parental home w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top