Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
SHRI SANJEEV SACHDEVA, CJ, SHRI VINAY SARAF, J
MAHESH GARG – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. pil questioning new water scheme resolutions due to unimplemented prior scheme. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court emphasizes necessity for water supply schemes due to population increase. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. final decision dismissing the petition. (Para 6) |
ORDER
Per: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva, Chief Justice
Petitioner has filed the subject Public Interest Litigation seeking quashing of Resolution dated 07.10.2023 of the Indore Municipal Corporation and Resolution dated 14.09.2023 of the Mayor-in-Council, wherein a detailed project report has been approved for supply of fresh water under AMRUT 2.0.
2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in the year 2011 AMRUT 1.0 scheme was formulated, however said scheme has not yet been completely implemented and despite the same, AMRUT 2.0 scheme has been floated. He submits that an extra burden would be passed on to the exchequer for the same.
3. We note from the AMRUT 2.0 scheme records that in the year 2011, the population of Indore was about 19.64 lacs and thereafter 29 villages have been added in the Indore Municipal Corporation which has taken the population to nearely 22 lacs and the area of the city has increased by 28
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
