SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 9088

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Brij Kishore – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Santosh Agrawal[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT SETH WRIT PETITION No. 32560 of 2025 BRIJ KISHORE AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Santosh Agrawal - Advocate for the petitioners.

Shri Yogesh Parashar Government Advocate for the respondents No. 1 & 2/State.

Shri Pallav Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 3 to 5.

O R D E R

(Delivered on this day of 27 th November, 2025)

1. With the consent of learned counsel for the rival parties, matter is heard finally. 2. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India takes exception to the order dated 07/04/2025 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Chambal Division, Morena, whereby, second appeal preferred by the respondents No. 3 to 5 under section 44(2) of MPLRC, 1959 challenging the order dated 19/09/2024 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Gohad, District Bhind (first appellate authority) has been allowed and the order dated 19/09/2024 passed by the first appellate authority has been set aside, thereby, maintaining the mutation order dated 19/09/2017 passed by the Tehsildar, Gohad, District Bhind. The petition also challenges the order

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top